Do you despair that you'll never be loved?
Is your home field's crop smooth river rock?
When you look in a mirror is no one beside you?
Can Santa find nothing to put in your sock?
...
Read full text
i like the rhyming. i like the flow. but i have (at least) one question, rhetorical. i shall accept suggested answer(s) , which doesn't mean i'll agree!
in these lines:
It is freedom to love or not love that holds blessing
And choice not just chemistry forms a true bond,
OH! I just reread the lines and noticed YOUR just, in not just chemistry.
so i guess you admit that so-called chemistry DOES influence who one loves or does not love. i at first was going to ask if you thought choosing, on one person's part, was enough to form a bond and be loved.
so, it is more complex after all. one can be free to love or not, but i'd say the freedom is not exactly controlled freedom. i may love someone but at the same time i may think i should not love the person.
and between two people, one may love the other but not get love back in return. there has to be chemistry, i.e.
the person/chemical # 1 must mix well enough with person/chemical #2 to form a chemical bond which is (hopefully) stable. it will not explode and injure both, and it will not deteriorate until the bond is dissolved over time.
hey, this is interesting but not a lot of fun to talk about!
bri :)
Poems are the property of their respective owners. All information has been reproduced here for educational and informational purposes to benefit site visitors, and is provided at no charge...
i like the rhyming. i like the flow. but i have (at least) one question, rhetorical. i shall accept suggested answer(s) , which doesn't mean i'll agree! in these lines: It is freedom to love or not love that holds blessing And choice not just chemistry forms a true bond, OH! I just reread the lines and noticed YOUR just, in not just chemistry. so i guess you admit that so-called chemistry DOES influence who one loves or does not love. i at first was going to ask if you thought choosing, on one person's part, was enough to form a bond and be loved. so, it is more complex after all. one can be free to love or not, but i'd say the freedom is not exactly controlled freedom. i may love someone but at the same time i may think i should not love the person. and between two people, one may love the other but not get love back in return. there has to be chemistry, i.e. the person/chemical # 1 must mix well enough with person/chemical #2 to form a chemical bond which is (hopefully) stable. it will not explode and injure both, and it will not deteriorate until the bond is dissolved over time. hey, this is interesting but not a lot of fun to talk about! bri :)